Archive for October, 2005

Saturday, October 29, 2005

Hollywood: Same Shit, Different Pile

Was making the movie Zathura necessary? Really? It’s about a couple boys who find a board game that propels their house into a space adventure. Does that sound familiar? That’s Jumanji, except in space instead of the jungle.

Well, that’s not entirely accurate. There’s no Robin Williams, or even young, hot, Kirsten Dunst. Instead, we have Dax Shepard (I’ve never heard of him either) and two young boys. Oh, and Tim Robbins. I can understand the younger actors getting involved, but Tim Robbins. I should send this, if I had his address.

Dear Tim,

Fire your agent. He’s a moron.

Your friend, Derik

In all fairness, this actually a sequel of sorts to Jumanji, but didn’t we get our fill of that plot in the first movie? Is there an original idea in all of California? Based upon the script ideas in Query Letters I Love, it doesn’t seem like it. Hell, this summer was all remakes and sequels.

There’s a reason I’ve seen a single movie in theaters in the last three months. It’s not because it’s expensive (that only helps).

Tuesday, October 25, 2005

Understanding Good RSS Use

I love RSS. I subscribe to 243 feeds. I’ve curbed my reading though, so I miss most stuff during the day. However, that doesn’t stop me from being driven nuts on a regular basis.

The first is Day by Day. First, it doesn’t put the comic in the feed. That alone is forgivable. Lots of comic RSS feeds do that. The problem is that new entries show up before the cartoon is uploaded. Hello? This isn’t a once in a while thing. This happens every night. Message received by this reader: I will unsubscribe and stop reading.

The second is Google’s RSS news feeds. They constantly changed the items, causing them to show up unread time and again. If they’re concerned about people seeing the full list of sources, they should link to their site instead of polluting my reader.

That is all.

Monday, October 24, 2005

House Pictures

I haven’t posted in a while due partially to getting a cat (pictures will follow… someday). As I went to go to take pictures, I realized both my batteries were dead. Charging them takes a while, so I sat down to finally label and describe all the photos I took when I moved into my house, all 82 of them. Now you know why it took me a couple months to get around to it.

I haven’t fully tagged it, but it’s certainly viewable over on Flickr. Now you can see where the magic happens. While I was logged in, I noticed that Jason put up some cool football pictures which are worth a look if you’re a football or Cal/WSU fan.

Thursday, October 13, 2005

iPod Video and new iMac Thoughts

We didn’t see Powerbook, Powermac, and Mac mini revisions like most level headed analysts thought. Macrumors’ Buyer’s Guide still has the bright red “Don’t Buy” description next to the Powerbooks. The typical cycle is 185 days, and we’re now 255 in. I wouldn’t be surprised to see them next revised in January as the first Intel Macs (as they stand to benefit the most, being stuck with maxed out G4s).

Instead, the long-awaited video iPod arrived, the iMac got revised (in a rather interesting way), and the eMac has returned to its proper status as an education product.

The iPod

The iPod has returned to its original name, simply “iPod”. No more “photo”. No “video”. They’ve added video capabilities, which will please some. Naturally, they’ve started selling music videos to play on it. But really, who watches music videos more than once or twice? Who’s going to speculatively buy a music video without having seen it first? And if they’ve seen it first, why wouldn’t one just buy the song and save some cash?

That was my problem with that being Apple’s bread and butter for the video iPod. Music videos simply aren’t compelling content. Save the “old fart” arguments. Don’t tell me that I don’t understand kids today and that they will come out in droves for them. It’s simply not true. If kids do buy them, it’s because they have no notion of money and music videos on the iPod will be a novelty. At best.

The staying power for video on the iPod is TV (and later, movies). That was the key move that Apple needed to make to lock its position in the consumer video world. Until this, the problem was content. Sure, there were hacky (and illegal) ways to get television content and movies into portable devices, but for the consumer, it was virtually unavailable. Portable video players were very pretty, expensive bricks.

Apple has combined time shifting with a portable player to capture market share previously untapped by both Apple and television producers. Not everyone can stay up to watch shows when they are shown. TiVo has captured a lot of that market, but for many consumers, it’s still a bit too complicated. Many people have rather extended commutes (I’m now exluded from that group, ha). With rising gas prices, mass transit is increasing in popularity, leaving some with an hour+ ride. Bring able to watch one’s favorite TV shows during that commute is not only a good way to pass the time, but effectively frees up even more leisure time. That’s big.

Next will be movies, the hesitation point there being a couple things. First, bandwidth. Despite consumer perception, it costs money. For movies, that can be a lot of money. Further, high quality movies can take a long time to download. Compare that with things like On Demand, and the value begins to dwindle. The second issue is quality. Currently, only 320 x 240, 768 Kbps movies can be handled by the iPod. That’s a quarter of the pixels in standard television. Also, that level of compression can create artifacts.

That simply comes nowhere near DVDs, which has become the gold standard for movies. That means that although you can play those movies on your TV, the video quality will be severely lacking and you also won’t have surround sound. Apple will need to have another revision before the iPod will become everybody’s home for movies.

iSight iMac

The direction for the iMac has become much more clear. It’s moving away from the prosumer status it had and back firmly into consumer. I’m not saying it’s no longer a capable machine. Really, it’s more capable than ever. However, it’s not targeted at pros. It’s all about the consumer.

First off, an iSight built into the computer itself is brilliant! Of course, it’s not so great if it breaks or you get a new computer and want to migrate it, but it makes the iMac much more complete out of box. Immediately you can start video conferencing with your family. This would be ideal for people like my dear mother. She could set it up in the kitchen and practically use it as a videophone.

Add to that the new Front Row software, which includes a remote, you’ve got a really easy to use computer. In fact, I’d say that this single application adds all the media center functionality that many people desire. What’s missing is some kind of TV device for TiVo functionality. Had Apple included something like that, I’d be ordering one. Even without I’m still considering it because there’s always El Gato and their EyeTV line of hardware/software. I could even use my existing USB version.

Hype

The iMac upgrade has gotten less attention from the public at large because the video iPod was talked about so much. I’m much more excited about the new iMac than the iPod. That strikes me as odd because the iPod is much cheaper and generally computer revisions do little for me (well, except the iMac G4 previously).

Wednesday, October 12, 2005

iTunes 5 is Dead; Long Live iTunes 6

According to live news updates out of Apple’s press conference today, iTunes 6 will be introduced today.

You didn’t misread that. Barely a month after its introduction, iTunes 5 has been superceded by iTunes 6. A month. Good lord.

It’s official: iTunes 5 was most meaningless iTunes update ever. Either that, or we can expect iTunes 7 at Thanksgiving, earning it the name “iTunes Turkey Edition”. That will be followed by a Christmas version 8 with an all red and green interface.

The question jumbling around in my brain is “Is video the only addition in this version?” From what I read, it is. iTunes already had rudimentary video support. Why, oh why didn’t Apple just bump the version to 5.5 (at most, I think 5.1 would be more appropriate). It would explain why Apple didn’t change iTunes’ icon color (minor, yes, but it was enough to bug me).

Honestly, Apple is getting a little loosey goosey with iTunes versioning. It’s time to reign it back in.