Archive for August 1st, 2005

Monday, August 1, 2005

Payola

I pulled the trigger on it. I added Google Ads to Tag Central. I’ve also added a shop section to this site. If you’re looking to buy something I’ve reviewed on the site or anything else from Amazon, please use that page. There is no cost difference to you and I get a percentage of the sale. It’s a great way for you to get some merchandise at a good price generally with free shipping and support the site.

Don’t worry. Putting ads here is not something I plan to do (at least for now). I reserve that right if times get tight, but I really don’t think it’ll be necessary. I’m definitely not putting ads into the feeds. That’s plain obnoxious. As for Tag Central, now that I’ve got it set up and running by itself, I need some other kind of motivation. I thought I’d try out financial.

As usual, let me know your thoughts.

The Dangers of Email Addresses in RSS Feeds

There has been an update, so please read to the bottom of the post. I leave the original entry above for posterity.

Frassle is a neat service. What is not neat is that they seem to resell email addresses. My domain allows me to use any address at it (they all get redirected to a central address). This allows me to tailor a name to each service. The old tact was to use a Yahoo or Hotmail account (which didn’t have any accountability). My convention right now is either service1 or service.login1.

Some addresses that were slightly exposed at one point, contact and photoadmin, regularly get email about updating their bank, ebay, and paypal records, with a handy, dandy link to do it right from the email. Real nice. eyeroll

For the first time, I received some spam from a service email, frassle1. Not cool. I will be emailing the operator of the site to get an explanation. I’ll keep y’all updated. In the meantime, if you want to use their service, use a throwaway address like a Yahoo account.

Update: As Shimon explains in the comments, the email was not sold. I apologize for accusing him of such. In fact, he was doing the right thing to an ill effect.

The problem lies in RSS 2.0, which mandates an email address in the author element as well as in the managingEditor and webMaster elements. Luckily, they are optional, but the fact that they can’t simply be a name as written in the specification, sucks. Surely, the creators of RSS 2.0 forsaw that a machine parseable format would lend itself to spambots harvesting feeds for email addresses.

Shimon was filling in this element with the registration email, which according to the specification, was proper and good. He was supplying all the information that was available. A good thing to do in most cases. He has altered the feeds to remove this optional element. Other sites take an alternative tact and instead fill in a bogus email address just to make the feed validate. There’s something quite clearly wrong with RSS 2.0 when feed authors are forced to use bogus data.

Update Part Deux: Shimon wrote a blog entry about the link (discovered via Technorati prompting me again to perhaps drop trackbacks and use Kramer). He’s a good guy for taking my original accustion with such grace and being up front with his users. He even lives in the Boston area like yours truly.

Well, if you consider the Boston area the eastern half of Massachusetts. No “boondocks” quips from the peanut gallery.

OS X Intel Uses DRM

Found via Slashdot, Apple is using DRM to keep parts of the OS from working on unauthorized computers. The Slashdot story includes links to a wiki on x86 Mac OS X, which in turn pulls its information about the TCPA/TPM DRM from this FAQ.

The problem is that the site is titled Against TCPA (which is also their domain name). It’s not exactly an unbiased source, to say the least. I want to find a slightly less paranoid breakdown of the technology.

That said, this may very well be the way that Apple wants to use to prohibit use of Mac OS X on generic Intel PCs. The question then becomes is this DRM in some way hackable? If so, we’ll likely see OS X on generic Intel PCs. If not, we won’t.